I recognized 59 randomised regulated products off calcium consumption that stated BMD once the a result

I recognized 59 randomised regulated products off calcium consumption that stated BMD once the a result

Standard functions

7 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Fifteen studied dietary sources of calcium (n=810 calcium, n=723 controls),16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 and 51 studied calcium supplements (n=6547 calcium, n=5710 controls).7 12 13 14 15 17 19 20 21 22 26 28 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Table 1 ? shows study design and selected baseline characteristics for included studies of dietary calcium. Tables 2 and 3 show the study design and selected baseline characteristics for trials of calcium supplements, without and with additional vitamin D, respectively. ? ? Further details are in tables A-C in appendix 2. Of the 15 randomised controlled trials of dietary sources of calcium, 10 used milk or milk powder, two used dairy products, and three used hydroxyapatite preparations. Of the 51 trials of calcium supplements, 36 studied calcium monotherapy, 13 co-administered CaD, and two were multi-arm studies of both. Table 4 summarises other features of the trials ? . Most of them studied calcium without vitamin D in women aged <70 living in the community; the mean baseline dietary calcium intake was <800 mg/day; and most trials lasted ?2 years. A calcium dose of >500 mg/day was used in most trials, but a higher proportion of trials of calcium supplements used a dose of ?1000 mg/day. Table C in appendix 2 shows our assessment of risk of bias. Of the 15 trials of dietary sources of calcium, we assessed two as low risk of bias, six as moderate risk, and seven as high risk. Of the 51 trials of calcium supplements, we assessed 19 as low risk of bias, 12 as moderate risk, and 20 as high risk.

Model of randomised regulated products and you may chose baseline services of qualified examples of calcium that also used supplement D supplements

First analyses

Desk 5 ? summarises the results of your meta-analyses. Growing calcium supplements intake of slimming down offer improved BMD from the 0.6-step 1.0% on full cool and you can complete muscles in the 12 months and by the 0.7-step 1.8% within the internet sites and lumbar lower back and femoral shoulder during the 2 years (figs step 1 and you may dos ? ? . There is certainly zero affect BMD within forearm.

Fig step 1 Random consequences meta-data of aftereffect of dietary types of calcium supplements with the percentage alter during the bone mineral occurrence (BMD) away from baseline within 1 year

Fig 2 Arbitrary outcomes meta-studies off effectation of weight reduction sources of calcium into fee changes inside the bones nutrient occurrence (BMD) away from standard at 2 years

As soon as we restricted new analyses towards a dozen randomised managed samples of milk products otherwise dairy foods, of the excluding around three samples regarding hydroxyapatite, there is certainly absolutely nothing change in the outcomes. Calcium enhanced BMD at all five skeletal websites of the 0.7-step 1.4% from the one year (figs step three and you will cuatro ? ? ), by 0.8-1.5% from the two years (figs 5 and you may 6 ? ? ), by 0.8-1.8% within recensioni utenti solo sikh more than two and a half many years (fig eight ? ) (directory of duration of products was less than six ages).

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai.

0362041262